UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | ||
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | ||
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | ||
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | ||
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Bridge Bancorp, Inc. | |||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) | |||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. | ||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
(2) | ||
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
(3) | ||
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
(4) | ||
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
(5) | ||
Total fee paid: |
☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) | |||
Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) | |||
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |||
(3) | Filing Party: |
(4) | Date Filed: |
BRIDGE BANCORP, INC.
2200 Montauk Highway, P.O. Box 3005
Bridgehampton, NY 11932
April 3, 201728, 2020
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend theThe Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Bridge Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”). Our Annual Meeting will be held at the offices of our subsidiary, The Bridgehampton NationalBNB Bank, 2200 Montauk Highway, Bridgehampton, New York 11932, on Friday, May 5, 2017Tuesday, June 2, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.
The enclosed Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement describe the formal business to be transacted at the Annual Meeting. During the Annual Meeting we will also report on the operations of the Company. Directors and officers of the Company will be present to respond to questions that shareholders may have. Also enclosed for your review is our Annual Report, which contains detailed information concerning the operating activities and financial statements of the Company.
The business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting consists of the election of four Directors; an advisory (non-binding) vote on executive compensation; an advisory (non-binding) vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation; and the ratification of the appointment of anour Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year ending December 31, 2017.2020. The Board of Directors of the Company unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of Directors, “FOR” the approval of executive compensation, “FOR” the one year frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation and “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, we urge you to sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card, or cast your vote electronically, as soon as possible, even if you currently plan to attend the Annual Meeting. This will not prevent you from voting in person, but will assure that your vote is counted if you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting. Your vote is important, regardless of the number of shares that you own. Thank you for your continued investment in Bridge Bancorp, Inc.
In light of the ongoing health concerns relating to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to best protect the health of our employees, shareholders and community, we are requesting that shareholders consider the requirements of federal and state governmental agencies when deciding whether or not to attend the Annual Meeting in person this year. Shareholders can call into the following number to listen to the meeting live: 1-844-746-0738. Participants will be asked to join into the Bridge Bancorp BDGE call. We may be required to take further actions to limit attendance at the Annual Meeting if required by appropriate governmental orders and as developments occur.
Sincerely, | |
Kevin M. O’Connor | |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
BRIDGE BANCORP, INC.
2200 Montauk Highway, P.O. Box 3005
Bridgehampton, NY 11932
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
TO BE HELD MAY 5, 2017
JUNE 2, 2020
To the Shareholders of Bridge Bancorp, Inc.:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Bridge Bancorp, Inc. will be held at The Bridgehampton NationalBNB Bank, 2200 Montauk Highway, Bridgehampton, New York 11932, on Friday, May 5, 2017,Tuesday, June 2, 2020, at 11:00 a.m., for the purpose of considering and voting on the following matters:
1) | The election of four Directors to the Company’s Board of Directors, to hold office for a term of three years, and until their successors are elected and qualified; |
2) | An advisory (non-binding) vote to approve our executive compensation as described in the proxy statement; |
3) |
The ratification of the appointment of Crowe |
such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. Any action may be taken on the foregoing proposals at the Annual Meeting on the date specified above, including all adjournments of the Annual Meeting. Only those shareholders of record at the close of business on March 20, 2017April 24, 2020 shall be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
The Board of Directors believes that the election of the director nominees, the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve executive compensation, a one year frequency of future votes on executive compensation, and the ratification of the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and unanimously recommends a voteFOR Itemsproposals 1, 2, and 4 andFOR a one year frequency of future votes on executive compensation in Item 3.
EACH SHAREHOLDER WHETHER HE OR SHE PLANS TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, IS REQUESTED TO SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD WITHOUT DELAY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE, OR TO VOTE ELECTRONICALLY AS PROVIDED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDED HEREWITH.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 5, 2017JUNE 2, 2020 -This Proxy Statement and our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K are each available at THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10‑K ARE EACH AVAILABLE AT http://www.edocumentview.com/BDGE.BDGE.
By order of the Board of Directors
Howard H. Nolan
Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Corporate Secretary
April 3, 201728, 2020
Bridgehampton, New York
IN LIGHT OF THE ONGOING HEALTH CONCERNS RELATING TO THE CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) AND TO BEST PROTECT THE HEALTH OF OUR EMPLOYEES, SHAREHOLDERS AND COMMUNITY, WE ARE REQUESTING THAT SHAREHOLDERS CONSIDER THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES WHEN DECIDING WHETHER OR NOT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON THIS YEAR. SHAREHOLDERS CAN CALL INTO THE FOLLOWING NUMBER TO LISTEN TO THE MEETING LIVE: 1-844-746-0738. PARTICIPANTS WILL BE ASKED TO JOIN INTO THE BRIDGE BANCORP BDGE CALL. WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO TAKE FURTHER ACTIONS TO LIMIT ATTENDANCE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING IF REQUIRED BY APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL ORDERS AND AS DEVELOPMENTS OCCUR.
BRIDGE BANCORP, INC.
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held May 5, 2017
June 2, 2020
SOLICITATION AND VOTING OF PROXIES
This Proxy Statement is being furnished to shareholders of Bridge Bancorp, Inc. in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of proxies to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at The Bridgehampton NationalBNB Bank (the “Bank”), 2200 Montauk Highway, Bridgehampton, New York 11932, on May 5, 2017June 2, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. or any adjournments thereof. The 20172019 Annual Report to Shareholders, including the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2019, accompanies this Proxy Statement.
Regardless of the number of shares of Common Stock owned, it is important that shareholders be represented by proxy or be present in person at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders are requested to vote by completing the enclosed proxy card and returning it signed and dated in the enclosed envelope, or to vote electronically. Shareholders should indicate their votes in the spaces provided on the proxy card. Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company will be voted in accordance with the directions given therein. Where no instructions are indicated, executed proxies will be votedFOR the election of the director nominees specified in this Proxy Statement;FOR the approval of executive compensation; and FORone year frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation; andFOR the ratification of Crowe Horwath LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year ending December 31, 2017.
2020.
The Board of Directors knows of no additional matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. Execution of a proxy, however, confers discretionary authority on the designated proxy holder to vote the shares in accordance with their best judgment on such other business, if any, which may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.
A proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise by the filing of written revocation with the Secretary of the Company, by delivering to the Company a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting, filing a revocation with the Secretary and voting in person. However, if you are a shareholder whose shares are not registered in your own name, you will need appropriate documentation from your record holder to vote personally at the Annual Meeting.
The cost of solicitation of proxies in the form enclosed herewith will be borne by the Company. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, proxies may also be solicited personally, by telephone or by facsimile, by Directors, officers and employees of the Company, without additional compensation therefore.
This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being mailed to shareholders on or about April 3, 2017.28, 2020.
COVID-19 PANDEMIC CONSIDERATIONS
In light of the ongoing health concerns relating to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to best protect the health of our employees, shareholders and community, we are requesting that shareholders consider the requirements of federal and state governmental agencies when deciding whether or not to attend the Annual Meeting in person this year. Shareholders can call into the following number to listen to the meeting live: 1-844-746-0738. Participants will be asked to join into the Bridge Bancorp BDGE call. We may be required to take further actions to limit attendance at the Annual Meeting if required by appropriate governmental orders and as developments occur.
- 1 -
VOTING SECURITIES
The securities which may be voted at the Annual Meeting consist of shares of Common Stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”), with each share entitling its owner to one vote on all matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. The close of business on March 20, 2017April 24, 2020 has been fixed by the Board of Directors as the record date (“Record Date”) for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at this Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. The total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date was 19,694,24119,721,892 shares. The presence, in person or by proxy, of at least a majority of the total number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at this Annual Meeting. In the event there are not sufficient votes for a quorum, or to approve or ratify any matter being presented at the time of this Annual Meeting, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned in order to permit the further solicitation of proxies.
SECURITY OWNERSHIPof Certain Beneficial Owners
OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Persons and groups who beneficially own in excess of five percent of the Common Stock are required to file certain reports with the Company and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding such beneficial ownership. The following table sets forth, as of March 20, 2017,April 24, 2020, certain information as to the shares of Common Stock owned by persons who beneficially own more than five percent of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock. We know of no persons, except as listed below, who beneficially owned more than five percent of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 20, 2017.April 24, 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Number of Shares Owned |
| Percentage of |
|
Name and Address |
| and Nature of Beneficial |
| Outstanding |
|
of Beneficial Owner |
| Ownership |
| Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
100 E. Pratt Street |
| 2,448,337 | (1) | 12.4 | % |
Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basswood Capital Management L.L.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
645 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor |
| 2,308,900 | (2) | 11.7 | % |
New York, NY 10022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
55 East 52nd Street |
| 1,186,771 | (3) | 6.0 | % |
New York, NY 10055 |
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) | Represents the total shares of Common Stock collectively beneficially owned by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and certain other reporting persons as described in the Schedule 13G/A filed jointly on February 14, 2020 with the SEC. |
(2) | Represents the total shares of Common Stock collectively beneficially owned by Basswood Capital Management, L.L.C., Matthew Lindenbaum, Bennett Lindenbaum and certain other reporting persons. |
(3) | Represents the total shares of Common Stock collectively beneficially owned by Blackrock, Inc. as described in the Schedule 13G/A filed February 5, 2020 with the SEC. |
VOTING PROCEDURES AND METHOD OF COUNTING VOTES
As to the election of Directors, the proxy card being provided by the Board of Directors enables a shareholder to vote “FOR” the election of the four nominees proposed by the Board of Directors, or to “WITHHOLD AUTHORITY” to vote for all or any of the nominees being proposed. Directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast, without regard to either broker non-votes, or proxies as to which authority to vote for the nominees being proposed is withheld.
- 2 -
As to the advisory vote for the approval of the compensation paid to our named executive officers (“NEOs”), and the ratification of Crowe Horwath LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, by checking the appropriate box, a shareholder may: (i) vote “FOR” the item; (ii) vote “AGAINST” the item; or (iii) “ABSTAIN” from voting on such item. The approval of these matters will be determined by a majority of the votes cast, without regard to broker non-votes, or proxies marked “ABSTAIN.”
With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of future votes on executive compensation, a shareholder may vote for 1, 2 or 3 years, or may abstain, and the advisory vote on frequency will be determined by the number of years which receives the most votes cast.
Proxies solicited hereby will be returned to the Company, and will be tabulated by inspectors of election designated by the Board of Directors.
- 23 -
PROPOSAL I - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Company’s Board of Directors currently consists of twelve (12) members. The Board is divided into three classes as nearly equal in number as possibleclasses (Class A, B, and C). Each year one class of Directors is elected to serve for a three-year term and until their respective successors shall have been elected and qualified.
The Board of Directors has nominated Charles I. Massoud, Raymond A. Nielsen, Kevin M. O’Connor and Thomas J. Tobin for election as Class C Directors.Directors, each for a term of office expiring in 2023, and until their successors are elected and qualified. It is intended that the proxies solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors will be voted at the Annual Meeting for the election of each of these nominees (other than proxies in which the vote is withheld as to any nominee). If a nominee is unable to serve, the shares represented by all such proxies will be voted for the election of such substitute as the Board of Directors may recommend. At this time, the Board of Directors knows of no reason why a nominee would be unable to serve, if elected. Under the terms of his employment agreement with the Company, Mr. O’Connor is required to be appointed to the Board of Directors, subject to shareholder approval, as long as he serves as President and Chief Executive Officer. Other than the foregoing, there are no arrangements or understandings between a nominee and any other person pursuant to which such nominee was selected.
- 4 -
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
The following table sets forth certain information, as of March 20, 2017,April 24, 2020, regarding the Board of Directors and each NEO identified in the summary compensation table included elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common Stock of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Director of the Company |
| Beneficially |
|
|
|
Name and Age |
| Position Held |
| Since |
| Owned(1) |
| Percent |
|
Nominees for Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class C (term to expire in 2023) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles I. Massoud |
| Director |
| 2002 |
| 23,741 |
| * |
|
Raymond A. Nielsen |
| Director |
| 2013 |
| 11,694 |
| * |
|
Kevin M. O’Connor |
| President and Chief Executive Officer, Director |
| 2007 |
| 171,250 | (2) | * |
|
Thomas J. Tobin |
| Director |
| 1989 |
| 21,511 |
| * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A (term to expire in 2021) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis A. Suskind |
| Director, Vice Chairman of the Board |
| 2002 |
| 67,683 |
| * |
|
Albert E. McCoy, Jr. |
| Director |
| 2008 |
| 145,850 |
| * |
|
Christian C. Yegen |
| Director |
| 2015 |
| 99,684 |
| * |
|
Matthew Lindenbaum |
| Director |
| 2018 |
| 2,306,943 | (3) | 11.7 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B (term to expire in 2022) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcia Z. Hefter |
| Director, Chairperson of the Board |
| 1989 |
| 91,542 |
| * |
|
Emanuel Arturi |
| Director |
| 2008 |
| 28,926 |
| * |
|
Rudolph J. Santoro |
| Director |
| 2009 |
| 23,365 |
| * |
|
Daniel Rubin |
| Director |
| 2015 |
| 84,255 | (4) | * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who are not Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howard H. Nolan |
| Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Corporate Secretary |
|
|
| 63,984 | (5) | * |
|
Kevin L. Santacroce |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer |
|
|
| 38,480 | (6) | * |
|
John M. McCaffery |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
|
| 31,754 | (7) | * |
|
James J. Manseau |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Banking Officer |
|
|
| 43,095 | (8) | * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Directors, Director nominees and Executive Officers as a Group (16 persons) |
|
|
|
|
| 3,253,756 | (9) | 16.5 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Represents less than 1%
- 35 -
Name and Age | Position Held | Director of the Company Since | Shares of Common Stock of the Company Beneficially Owned(1) | Percent | ||||||||||
Nominees for Director | ||||||||||||||
Class C (term to expire in 2020) | ||||||||||||||
Charles I. Massoud Age 72 | Director | 2002 | 21,777 | * | ||||||||||
Raymond A. Nielsen Age 66 | Director | 2013 | 6,009 | * | ||||||||||
Kevin M. O’Connor Age 54 | President and Chief Executive Officer, Director | 2007 | 140,754 | (2) | * | |||||||||
Thomas J. Tobin Age 72 | Director | 1989 | 23,217 | * | ||||||||||
Continuing Directors | ||||||||||||||
Class A (term to expire in 2018) | ||||||||||||||
Dennis A. Suskind Age 74 | Director, Vice Chairman of the Board | 2002 | 79,183 | * | ||||||||||
Albert E. McCoy, Jr. Age 53 | Director | 2008 | 125,434 | * | ||||||||||
Daniel Rubin Age 68 | Director | 2015 | 84,754 | (3) | * | |||||||||
Christian C. Yegen Age 73 | Director | 2015 | 224,969 | 1.1 | ||||||||||
Class B (term expiring in 2019) | ||||||||||||||
Marcia Z. Hefter Age 73 | Director, Chairperson of the Board | 1989 | 90,182 | * | ||||||||||
Emanuel Arturi Age 71 | Director | 2008 | 61,767 | * | ||||||||||
Rudolph J. Santoro Age 72 | Director | 2009 | 19,338 | * | ||||||||||
Howard H. Nolan Age 56 | Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Corporate Secretary, Director | 2003 | 56,527 | (4) | * | |||||||||
Executive Officers who are not Directors | ||||||||||||||
Kevin L. Santacroce Age 48 | Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer | 43,748 | (5) | * | ||||||||||
James J. Manseau Age 53 | Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Banking Officer | 40,307 | (6) | * | ||||||||||
John M. McCaffery Age52 | Executive Vice President and Treasurer | 22,084 | (7) | * | ||||||||||
All Directors, Director nominees and Executive Officers as a Group (15 persons) | 1,040,050 | (8) | 5.3 | % |
(1) |
Includes shares as to which a person (or his/her spouse) directly or indirectly has or shares voting power and/or investment power (which includes the power to dispose) and all shares which the person has a right to acquire within 60 days of the reporting date. See “Stock Ownership Guidelines” included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
(2) | Includes |
(3) | Represents the total shares of Common Stock collectively beneficially owned by Matthew Lindenbaum and Basswood Capital Management, LLC, with respect to which Mr. Lindenbaum serves as a Principal, Managing Member and Portfolio Manager. As described in the Schedule 13D/A filed on December 18, 2017 with the SEC with respect to the Company’s Common Stock, each of Basswood Capital Management, LLC, Matthew Lindenbaum and Bennett Lindenbaum may be deemed to be part of a “group” with such other reporting persons. As of April 24, 2020, the group collectively beneficially own 2,308,900 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. |
(4) | Director Rubin had pledged |
(5) | Includes |
(6) | Includes |
- 4 -
(7) | Includes |
(8) | Includes |
(9) | Includes |
The business experience of each of the Company’s directors, NEOs and persons nominated to be elected as directors, as well as the qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Board of Directors to conclude that each director should serve on the Board are as follows:
Directors
Marcia Z. Hefter
Ms. Hefter is senior counsel in the law firm Esseks, Hefter, Angel, Di Talia & Pasca, LLP located in Riverhead, New York. She is Chairperson of the Company’s Board of Directors and serves on the Compensation Committee. Ms. Hefter has been a Director of the Company since 1989 and a Director of the Bank since 1988. Ms. Hefter is a graduate of Boston University and New York University School of Law. Ms. Hefter’s background as a lawyer and long standing service as a Director provides the Board of Directors with a unique perspective and counsel in its oversight of the Company.
Dennis A. Suskind
Mr. Suskind is a retired General Partner of Goldman Sachs & Co. He is Vice Chairperson of the Company’s Board of Directors and serves on the Audit Committee as a financial expert and as Chairperson of the Risk Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.Committees. He has been a Director of the Company since 2002. Mr. Suskind is also a Director of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and serves as a member on its Audit, Compensation, Finance, and FinanceExecutive Committees and is Chairperson of its Risk Committee. MrMr. Suskind is also a board member of Navistar Corporation.Corporation and the Chairperson of its Compensation Committee. His considerable experience in investment banking, capital markets and his service on the Board of Directors of another large publicly traded company are valuable to the Board of Directors in many ways, including its assessment of the Company’s sources and uses of capital.
Emanuel Arturi
Mr. Arturi is a retired Executive Vice Chairman of Knowledgent Group Inc., a business and technology consulting company. Mr. Arturi previously was co-founder of BusinessEdge Solutions Inc., a national consulting firm specializing in financial services, communications and life science industries. He was appointed to the Company’s Board in January 2008 and is Chairperson of the Compensation Committee. He is a graduate of Montclair State University and Fairleigh Dickinson University. Mr. Arturi also serves on the board of McGann-Mercy High School in Riverhead, New York. Mr. Arturi’s business and technology experience and familiarity with the communities served by the Company provide a broad business perspective to the Board of Directors.
- 6 -
Matthew Lindenbaum
Mr. Lindenbaum is Principal, Managing Member and Portfolio Manager of Basswood Capital Management, LLC. Mr. Lindenbaum previously served as Vice Chairman of Community National Bank (“CNB”) and was a director at CNB from 2005 to 2015. He has also served as a Director of Hudson Valley Holding Corp from 2014 to 2015. Mr. Lindenbaum is an experienced investor in community banks and his investor background and experience along with his service on the Board of Directors of other community banks are considered valuable attributes for service on the Board.
Charles I. Massoud
Mr. Massoud is President of Paumanok Vineyards located in Aquebogue, New York and President of Palmer Winery LTD. located in Riverhead, New York. Mr. Massoud serves as a member of the Audit Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Chairperson of the Loan Approval Committee, and has served as a Director of the Company since 2002. Mr. Massoud is a graduate of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and worked for IBM for nearly 20 years as a marketing executive. Mr. Massoud’s extensive knowledge of local markets, educational background, and business experience benefits the Board of Directors in its oversight of strategic planning and business development.
Albert E. McCoy, Jr.
Mr. McCoy is President of W. F. McCoy Petroleum Products Inc. and the McCoy Bus Company located in Bridgehampton, New York. Mr. McCoy is a member of the Compensation Committee and has served as a Director since April 2008. He is a graduate of George Washington University and a long standing shareholder of the Company. Mr. McCoy brings to the Board of Directors an extensive knowledge of local markets and the communities served by the Company which gives him unique insights into the Company’s lending
- 5 -
challenges and opportunities.
Raymond A. Nielsen
Mr. Nielsen is a Director of CVD Equipment Corp. He previously served as the Director of Finance for the Beechwood Organization responsible for Project and Corporate Finance including Strategic Planning Initiatives. Mr. Nielsen is the former CEO of Reliance Federal Savings Bank, Herald National Bank, and a 45 year veteran of the banking industry. Mr. Nielsen is a member of the Compensation Committee and has served as a Director since November 2013. Mr. Nielsen also served as a director of North Fork Bancorporation and its subsidiary North Fork Bank for 6 years where he chaired the Compensation and Audit Committees and also served as lead independent director. Mr. Nielsen’s extensive banking and real estate development experience and knowledge of the communities served by the Company, provides a valuable resource to the Board of Directors.
Daniel Rubin
Mr. Rubin was a former member of the Board of Directors of Community National Bank (“CNB”) who was appointed to the Board in June 2015. Mr. Rubin is a founding Board Member of the former Community State Bank of Teaneck, New Jersey. His business experience includes a long tenure in the textileBoard Chairmanship of two New York Stock Exchange companies, and fashion industry, as well as other entrepreneurialmany private business ventures. Mr. Rubin is a Board Member and past President of the United Jewish Appeal of Northern New JerseyJersey; past President and Trustee of the JCC on the Palisades in Tenafly, New Jersey; a former board memberBoard Member of Englewood Hospital and Medical Center in Englewood, New Jersey among other philanthropic affiliations.Jersey; and current Chairman of the National Coalition supporting Eurasian Jews. Mr. Rubin brings to the Board of Directors an extensive knowledge of the New York City and New Jersey real estate markets and the communities served by the Company which gives him unique insights into the Company’s lending challenges and opportunities.
Rudolph J. Santoro
Mr. Santoro is a retired Partner of Deloitte LLP, where he served as a National Industry Director of the Publishing and Media Industry. Mr. Santoro was appointed to the Board in June 2009 and serves as the Chairperson of the Audit Committee. Mr. Santoro is a graduate of Long Island University and is a Certified Public Accountant with approximately 38 years of public accounting experience. He also serves as Vice President of the Suffolk County Council of the Boy Scouts of America and as an Emeritus Board Member of Big Brother/Big Sisters of New York City. Mr. Santoro’s background in public accounting enhances the Board of Director’s oversight of financial reporting and disclosure issues.
- 7 -
Thomas J. Tobin
Mr. Tobin retired as President Emeritus and Special Advisor to the Board on March 2, 2010. Prior to January 1, 2008, Mr. Tobin was President and Chief Executive Officer, a position he held for 21 years. Mr. Tobin has served as a Director of the Company since 1989 and as a Director of the Bank since 1986. Mr. Tobin’s former position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, extensive banking experience and knowledge of the communities served by the Company, provides a valuable resource to the Board of Directors.
Christian C. Yegen
Mr. Yegen was a former member of the Board of Directors of CNB who was appointed to the Board in June 2015. Mr. Yegen was also on the board of the former Community State Bank of Teaneck, New Jersey. His diverse business experience includes 16 years as the Chairman of Yegen Holdings Corp., which was eventually sold to an investor group. He holds an apartment portfolio of over 1,000 units, owned and managed in northeast New Jersey. He received his undergraduate degree from Brown University and is a graduate of New York University School of Law. Mr. Yegen brings to the Board of Directors an extensive knowledge of the New York City and New Jersey real estate markets and the communities served by the Company which gives him unique insights into the Company’s lending challenges and opportunities.
- 6 -
NEOs Who Are Directors
Kevin M. O’Connor
Mr. O’Connor is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. He joined the Company in October 2007 as President and Chief Executive Officer Designee and Director. On January 1, 2008, he became President and CEO. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. O’Connor served as Executive Vice President and Treasurer of North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. from 1997 through 2007. Mr. O’Connor is a graduate of Adelphi University. Mr. O’Connor’s background and extensive banking experience provides a valuable resource to the Board of Directors.
NEOs Who Are Not Directors
Howard H. Nolan
Mr. Nolan is Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Corporate Secretary. He previously served as Chief Administrative & Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Nolan is a Certified Public Accountant and joined the Board as a Director in 2003 and was appointed Chief Operating Officer in June 2006. Prior to 2006, Mr. Nolan was Vice President of Finance and Treasurer for Gentiva Health Services, Inc. and held various management positions at Long Island Savings Bank and was Senior Audit Manager at KPMG. Mr. Nolan is a graduate of Dowling College.
Kevin L. Santacroce
Mr. Nolan’s backgroundSantacroce is Executive Vice President and extensive experienceChief Lending Officer of the Company. Mr. Santacroce joined the Company in operations, financeMarch 1997 as Assistant Cashier and accountingCredit Administrator. In January 2004, Mr. Santacroce was promoted to Senior Vice President and knowledgeChief Lending Officer. Mr. Santacroce is a graduate of local markets providesBryant University.
John M. McCaffery
Mr. McCaffery is Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. McCaffery joined the Company in 2012 as Senior Vice President and Treasurer, was promoted to Executive Vice President in 2014 and appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2016. Prior to his service at the Company, Mr. McCaffery was the Treasurer of State Bank of Long Island. Mr. McCaffery is a valuable resource to the Boardgraduate of Directors.
NEOs Who Are Not Directors
Hofstra University.
James J. Manseau
Mr. Manseau is Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Banking Officer of the Company. Mr. Manseau joined the Company as Senior Vice President and Chief Retail Banking Officer in March 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Manseau served as a Divisional Senior Vice President with North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. and Capital One. Mr. Manseau is a graduate of the State University of New York at Farmingdale.
Kevin L. Santacroce
Mr. Santacroce is Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of the Company. Mr. Santacroce joined the Company in March 1997 as Assistant Cashier and Credit Administrator. In January 2004, Mr. Santacroce was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer. Mr. Santacroce is a graduate of Bryant University.- 8 -
John M. McCaffery
Mr. McCaffery is Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. McCaffery joined the Company in 2012 as Senior Vice President and Treasurer, was promoted to Executive Vice President in 2014 and appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2016. Prior to his service at the Company, McCaffery was the Treasurer of State Bank of Long Island. Mr. McCaffery is a graduate of Hofstra University.
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
The Board of Directors has established a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committeefor the selection of Directors to be elected by the shareholders. Nominations of Directors to the Board are recommended by the Committee and determined by the full Board of Directors. The Board believes that it is appropriate to have the input of all Directors with respect to the candidates to be considered for election to the Board by the shareholders. In this regard, the Board believes that each individual director has a unique insight into the operations of the Company and the Bank, the communities in which we operate, and the needs of the Company with respect to Board membership.
The Board has determined that, except as to Messrs.Mr. O’Connor, and Nolan, each member of the Board is an “independent director” within the meaning of the corporate governance listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock
- 7 -
Market. Messrs.Mr. O’Connor and Nolan areis not considered independent because they are employeeshe is an employee of the Company. In reaching independence determinations of other Directors, the Board considered loans outstanding that were made on the same terms as available to others and as to the independence of Mr. Tobin, noted that the continuing compensation he receives from the Company for his prior employment as an executive officer, which employment ceased on March 2, 2010, is non-discretionary and not contingent on continuing service.
The Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter outlines the nomination process and is available on the Company’s website, www.bridgenb.comwww.bnbbank.com. The Committee identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are relevant to the Company’s business and who are willing to continue in service are first considered for re-nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by existing members of the Board with that of gaining new perspectives. The Committee coordinates annual performance evaluations for the board of directors. All nominees for director currently serve on the Board. If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service, or if the Committee decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, or if the size of the Board is increased, the Committee would solicit suggestions for director candidates from all Board members. The Board would seek to identify a candidate who at a minimum satisfies the following criteria:
· | Has the highest personal and professional ethics and integrity and whose values are compatible with those of the Company; |
· | Has had experiences and achievements that have given him or her the ability to exercise and develop good business judgment; |
· | Is willing to devote the necessary time to the work of the Board and its Committees, which includes being available for Board and Committee meetings; |
· | Is familiar with the communities in which the Company operates and/or is actively engaged in community activities; |
· | Is involved in other activities or interests that do not create a conflict with their responsibilities to the Company and its shareholders; and |
· | Has the capacity and desire to represent the balanced, best interests of the shareholders of the Company as a group, and not primarily a special interest group or constituency. |
WhileThe charter of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee does not havewas amended in 2019 to provide that diversity, inclusive of gender, race and ethnicity, shall be part of the selection criteria for determining the individuals to be considered for election and re-election to the Board. Further, the amended charter provides that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee shall endeavor in good faith to include women and people of color in each candidate pool for a formal policy with respect to diversityposition on the Board and in senior management. There is currently one woman on the Board of Directors consideration is given to nominatingand no persons with different perspectives and experience to enhance the deliberation and decision-making processes of the Board of Directors.color.
- 89 -
PROCEDURES FOR THE NOMINATION OF DIRECTORS BY SHAREHOLDERS
The Board has adopted procedures for the submission of director nominees by shareholders. If a determination is made that an additional candidate is needed for the Board of Directors, the Board will consider candidates submitted by a shareholder. Shareholders can submit the names of qualified candidates for Director by writing to our Corporate Secretary, Bridge Bancorp, Inc., 2200 Montauk Highway, P.O. Box 3005, Bridgehampton, New York 11932. The Corporate Secretary must receive a submission not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date of the Company’s proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting. The submission must include the following information:
· | The name and address of the shareholder as they appear on the Company’s books, and number of shares of Common Stock that are owned beneficially by such shareholder (if the shareholder is not a holder of record, appropriate evidence of the shareholder’s ownership will be required); |
· | The name, address and contact information for the candidate, and the number of shares of Common Stock that are owned by the candidate (if the candidate is not a holder of record, appropriate evidence of shareholder ownership should be provided); |
· | A statement of the candidate’s business and educational experience; |
· | Such other information regarding the candidate as would be required to be included in the proxy statement pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A; |
· | A statement detailing any relationship between the candidate and the Company; |
· | A statement detailing any relationship between the candidate and any customer, supplier or competitor of the Company; |
· | Detailed information about any relationship or understanding between the proposing shareholder and the candidate; and |
· | A statement that the candidate is willing to be considered and willing to serve as a Director if nominated and elected. |
A nomination submitted by a shareholder for presentation by the shareholder at an annual meeting of shareholders must comply with the procedural and informational requirements described in “Advance Notice of Business or Nominations to Be Brought Before an Annual Meeting.”
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
A shareholder of the Company who wants to communicate with the Board of Directors or with any individual Director can write to the Corporate Secretary, Bridge Bancorp, Inc., 2200 Montauk Highway, P.O. Box 3005, Bridgehampton, New York 11932, Attention: Board Administration.
The letter should indicate that the author is a shareholder and if shares are not held of record, should include appropriate evidence of stock ownership. Depending on the subject matter, managementthe Corporate Secretary will:
· | Forward the communication to the Director or Directors to whom it is addressed; |
· | Attempt to handle the inquiry directly, for example where it is a request for information about the Company or it is a stock-related matter; or |
· | Not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature, relates to an improper or irrelevant topic, or is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or otherwise inappropriate. |
At each Board meeting, managementthe Corporate Secretary shall present a summary of all communications received since the last meeting that were not forwarded and make those communications available to the Directors.
- 9 -
CODE OF ETHICSDaniel Rubin
The Board has adoptedMr. Rubin was a Code of Ethics that is applicable to the officers, directors and employees of the Company, including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal administrative officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s website,www.bridgenb.com. Amendments to and waivers from the Code of Ethics will also be disclosed on the Company’s website.
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The following three standing committees facilitate and assist the Board in executing its responsibilities: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The table below shows current membership for each of the standing Board committees.
|
|
|
The businessformer member of the Board of Directors of Community National Bank (“CNB”) who was appointed to the Board in June 2015. Mr. Rubin is a founding Board Member of the former Community State Bank of Teaneck, New Jersey. His business experience includes Board Chairmanship of two New York Stock Exchange companies, and many private business ventures. Mr. Rubin is a Board Member and past President of the United Jewish Appeal of Northern New Jersey; past President and Trustee of the JCC on the Palisades in Tenafly, New Jersey; a former Board Member of Englewood Hospital and Medical Center in Englewood, New Jersey; and current Chairman of the National Coalition supporting Eurasian Jews. Mr. Rubin brings to the Board of Directors an extensive knowledge of the New York City and New Jersey real estate markets and the communities served by the Company which gives him unique insights into the Company’s lending challenges and opportunities.
Rudolph J. Santoro
Mr. Santoro is a retired Partner of Deloitte LLP, where he served as a National Industry Director of the Publishing and Media Industry. Mr. Santoro was appointed to the Board in June 2009 and serves as the Chairperson of the Audit Committee. Mr. Santoro is a graduate of Long Island University and is a Certified Public Accountant with approximately 38 years of public accounting experience. He also serves as Vice President of the Suffolk County Council of the Boy Scouts of America and as an Emeritus Board Member of Big Brother/Big Sisters of New York City. Mr. Santoro’s background in public accounting enhances the Board of Director’s oversight of financial reporting and disclosure issues.
- 7 -
Thomas J. Tobin
Mr. Tobin retired as President Emeritus and Special Advisor to the Board on March 2, 2010. Prior to January 1, 2008, Mr. Tobin was President and Chief Executive Officer, a position he held for 21 years. Mr. Tobin has served as a Director of the Company since 1989 and as a Director of the Bank since 1986. Mr. Tobin’s former position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, extensive banking experience and knowledge of the communities served by the Company, provides a valuable resource to the Board of Directors.
Christian C. Yegen
Mr. Yegen was a former member of the Board of Directors of CNB who was appointed to the Board in June 2015. Mr. Yegen was also on the board of the former Community State Bank of Teaneck, New Jersey. His diverse business experience includes 16 years as the Chairman of Yegen Holdings Corp., which was eventually sold to an investor group. He holds an apartment portfolio of over 1,000 units, owned and managed in northeast New Jersey. He received his undergraduate degree from Brown University and is a graduate of New York University School of Law. Mr. Yegen brings to the Board of Directors an extensive knowledge of the New York City and New Jersey real estate markets and the Bankcommunities served by the Company which gives him unique insights into the Company’s lending challenges and opportunities.
NEOs Who Are Directors
Kevin M. O’Connor
Mr. O’Connor is conducted through meetingsPresident and activitiesChief Executive Officer of the BoardsCompany. He joined the Company in October 2007 as President and their Committees. Chief Executive Officer Designee and Director. On January 1, 2008, he became President and CEO. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. O’Connor served as Executive Vice President and Treasurer of North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. from 1997 through 2007. Mr. O’Connor is a graduate of Adelphi University. Mr. O’Connor’s background and extensive banking experience provides a valuable resource to the Board of Directors.
NEOs Who Are Not Directors
Howard H. Nolan
Mr. Nolan is Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Corporate Secretary. He previously served as Chief Administrative & Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Nolan is a Certified Public Accountant and joined the Board as a Director in 2003 and was appointed Chief Operating Officer in June 2006. Prior to 2006, Mr. Nolan was Vice President of Finance and Treasurer for Gentiva Health Services, Inc. and held various management positions at Long Island Savings Bank and was Senior Audit Manager at KPMG. Mr. Nolan is a graduate of Dowling College.
Kevin L. Santacroce
Mr. Santacroce is Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of the Company. Mr. Santacroce joined the Company in March 1997 as Assistant Cashier and Credit Administrator. In January 2004, Mr. Santacroce was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer. Mr. Santacroce is a graduate of Bryant University.
John M. McCaffery
Mr. McCaffery is Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. McCaffery joined the Company in 2012 as Senior Vice President and Treasurer, was promoted to Executive Vice President in 2014 and appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2016. Prior to his service at the Company, Mr. McCaffery was the Treasurer of State Bank of Long Island. Mr. McCaffery is a graduate of Hofstra University.
James J. Manseau
Mr. Manseau is Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Banking Officer of the Company. Mr. Manseau joined the Company as Senior Vice President and Chief Retail Banking Officer in March 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Manseau served as a Divisional Senior Vice President with North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. and Capital One. Mr. Manseau is a graduate of the State University of New York at Farmingdale.
- 8 -
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
The Board of Directors has established a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committeefor the selection of Directors to be elected by the shareholders. Nominations of Directors to the Board are recommended by the Committee and determined by the full Board of Directors. The Board believes that it is appropriate to have the input of all Directors with respect to the candidates to be considered for election to the Board by the shareholders. In this regard, the Board believes that each individual director has a unique insight into the operations of the Company and the Bank, meets monthly, or more often as may be necessary. The Board of Directorsthe communities in which we operate, and the needs of the Company and the Bank met seventeen times during 2016. No Director attended fewer than 75% in the aggregatewith respect to Board membership.
The Board has determined that, except as to Mr. O’Connor, each member of the total numberBoard is an “independent director” within the meaning of the corporate governance listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Mr. O’Connor is not considered independent because he is an employee of the Company. In reaching independence determinations of other Directors, the Board meetings heldconsidered loans outstanding that were made on the same terms as available to others and as to the total numberindependence of Mr. Tobin, noted that the continuing compensation he receives from the Company for his prior employment as an executive officer, which employment ceased on March 2, 2010, is non-discretionary and not contingent on continuing service.
The Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee meetingsCharter outlines the nomination process and is available on which hethe Company’s website, www.bnbbank.com. The Committee identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are relevant to the Company’s business and who are willing to continue in service are first considered for re-nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by existing members of the Board with that of gaining new perspectives. The Committee coordinates annual performance evaluations for the board of directors. All nominees for director currently serve on the Board. If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service, or she served during 2016, includingif the Committee decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, or if the size of the Board is increased, the Committee would solicit suggestions for director candidates from all Board members. The Board would seek to identify a candidate who at a minimum satisfies the following criteria:
· | Has the highest personal and professional ethics and integrity and whose values are compatible with those of the Company; |
· | Has had experiences and achievements that have given him or her the ability to exercise and develop good business judgment; |
· | Is willing to devote the necessary time to the work of the Board and its Committees, which includes being available for Board and Committee meetings; |
· | Is familiar with the communities in which the Company operates and/or is actively engaged in community activities; |
· | Is involved in other activities or interests that do not create a conflict with their responsibilities to the Company and its shareholders; and |
· | Has the capacity and desire to represent the balanced, best interests of the shareholders of the Company as a group, and not primarily a special interest group or constituency. |
The charter of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee was amended in 2019 to provide that diversity, inclusive of gender, race and ethnicity, shall be part of the selection criteria for determining the individuals to be considered for election and re-election to the Board. Further, the amended charter provides that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee shall endeavor in good faith to include women and people of color in each candidate pool for a position on the Board and Committee meetings of the Bank and the Company. Although it has no official policy, the Board strongly encourages each of its members to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All persons servingin senior management. There is currently one woman on the Board of Directors at the timeand no persons of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 6, 2016 attended the meeting.color.
BOARD LEADERSHIP AND RISK OVERSIGHT
- 9 -
Board Leadership StructurePROCEDURES FOR THE NOMINATION OF DIRECTORS BY SHAREHOLDERS
The Board historically has been chairedadopted procedures for the submission of director nominees by shareholders. If a determination is made that an independent director, rather than the chief executive officer. The current chairpersonadditional candidate is Ms. Marcia Hefter. The Board of Directors believes that the non-executive chair structure helps to distinguish the role of the chairperson, in managing the board, which in turn serves in an oversight capacity, from the responsibilities of the chief executive officer in managing the operations of the Company.
The Role of the Board in Risk Oversight
The entire Board of Directors is engaged in risk management oversight. The Audit Committee assistsneeded for the Board of Directors, in its oversightthe Board will consider candidates submitted by a shareholder. Shareholders can submit the names of qualified candidates for Director by writing to our Corporate Secretary, Bridge Bancorp, Inc., 2200 Montauk Highway, P.O. Box 3005, Bridgehampton, New York 11932. The Corporate Secretary must receive a submission not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date of the Company’s corporate-wide risk management and in identifying, measuring, monitoring, and managing risks, and as toproxy materials for the Audit Committee in particular, material financial risks. In addition,preceding year’s annual meeting. The submission must include the Bank’s Enterprise Risk Management Committee (“ERMC”) includes two independent directors who serve in an advisory role. The Board of Directors receives regular reports from these independent directors, as well as from the Audit Committee, as to the actions taken by management to adequately address those risks.
following information:
- 10 -
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee consists of Directors Santoro (Chairperson), Massoud, Rubin and Suskind. Each member of the Audit Committee is considered “independent” as defined in the NASDAQ® corporate governance listing standards and under SEC Rule 10A-3. The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee include, among other things:
· | The name and |
· | The name, address and contact information for the candidate, and the |
· | A statement of the |
· | Such other information regarding the |
The Audit Committee met eleven times during 2016. The Audit Committee reports to the Board on its activities and findings. The Board of Directors has determined that Rudolph Santoro and Dennis Suskind are “Audit Committee Financial Experts” as that term is used in the rules and regulations of the SEC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. A copy of the charter of the Audit Committee is available on the Company’s website,www.bridgenb.com.
Management is responsible for the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and their assessment of the design and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and opining on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and issuing their reports thereon. As provided in its charter, the Audit Committee’s responsibilities include monitoring and overseeing these processes.
In discharging its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:
· | A statement detailing any relationship between the |
· | A statement detailing any relationship between the |
· | Detailed information about any relationship or understanding between the |
- 11 -
· | A statement that the candidate is willing to be considered and willing to serve as a Director if nominated and elected. |
discussedA nomination submitted by a shareholder for presentation by the shareholder at an annual meeting of shareholders must comply with the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm its independence fromprocedural and informational requirements described in “Advance Notice of Business or Nominations to Be Brought Before an Annual Meeting.”
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
A shareholder of the Company.
Based on the reviews and discussions referredCompany who wants to above, the Audit Committee recommended tocommunicate with the Board of Directors or with any individual Director can write to the Corporate Secretary, Bridge Bancorp, Inc., 2200 Montauk Highway, P.O. Box 3005, Bridgehampton, New York 11932, Attention: Board Administration.
The letter should indicate that the audited consolidated financial statements be included inauthor is a shareholder and if shares are not held of record, should include appropriate evidence of stock ownership. Depending on the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forsubject matter, the year ended December 31, 2016Corporate Secretary will:
· | Forward the communication to the Director or Directors to whom it is addressed; |
· | Attempt to handle the inquiry directly, for example where it is a request for information about the Company or it is a stock-related matter; or |
· | Not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature, relates to an improper or irrelevant topic, or is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or otherwise inappropriate. |
At each Board meeting, the Corporate Secretary shall present a summary of all communications received since the last meeting that were not forwarded and filed with the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee selected Crowe Horwath LLP to be the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year ending December 31, 2017, subjectmake those communications available to the ratification of this appointment by the shareholders.Directors.
This report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
The foregoing report has been furnished by Committee members:
Rudolph J. Santoro, Chairperson
Charles I. Massoud
Daniel Rubin
Dennis A. SuskindMr. Rubin was a former member of the Board of Directors of Community National Bank (“CNB”) who was appointed to the Board in June 2015. Mr. Rubin is a founding Board Member of the former Community State Bank of Teaneck, New Jersey. His business experience includes Board Chairmanship of two New York Stock Exchange companies, and many private business ventures. Mr. Rubin is a Board Member and past President of the United Jewish Appeal of Northern New Jersey; past President and Trustee of the JCC on the Palisades in Tenafly, New Jersey; a former Board Member of Englewood Hospital and Medical Center in Englewood, New Jersey; and current Chairman of the National Coalition supporting Eurasian Jews. Mr. Rubin brings to the Board of Directors an extensive knowledge of the New York City and New Jersey real estate markets and the communities served by the Company which gives him unique insights into the Company’s lending challenges and opportunities.
Rudolph J. Santoro
Mr. Santoro is a retired Partner of Deloitte LLP, where he served as a National Industry Director of the Publishing and Media Industry. Mr. Santoro was appointed to the Board in June 2009 and serves as the Chairperson of the Audit Committee. Mr. Santoro is a graduate of Long Island University and is a Certified Public Accountant with approximately 38 years of public accounting experience. He also serves as Vice President of the Suffolk County Council of the Boy Scouts of America and as an Emeritus Board Member of Big Brother/Big Sisters of New York City. Mr. Santoro’s background in public accounting enhances the Board of Director’s oversight of financial reporting and disclosure issues.
- 7 -
Thomas J. Tobin
Mr. Tobin retired as President Emeritus and Special Advisor to the Board on March 2, 2010. Prior to January 1, 2008, Mr. Tobin was President and Chief Executive Officer, a position he held for 21 years. Mr. Tobin has served as a Director of the Company since 1989 and as a Director of the Bank since 1986. Mr. Tobin’s former position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, extensive banking experience and knowledge of the communities served by the Company, provides a valuable resource to the Board of Directors.
Christian C. Yegen
Mr. Yegen was a former member of the Board of Directors of CNB who was appointed to the Board in June 2015. Mr. Yegen was also on the board of the former Community State Bank of Teaneck, New Jersey. His diverse business experience includes 16 years as the Chairman of Yegen Holdings Corp., which was eventually sold to an investor group. He holds an apartment portfolio of over 1,000 units, owned and managed in northeast New Jersey. He received his undergraduate degree from Brown University and is a graduate of New York University School of Law. Mr. Yegen brings to the Board of Directors an extensive knowledge of the New York City and New Jersey real estate markets and the communities served by the Company which gives him unique insights into the Company’s lending challenges and opportunities.
NEOs Who Are Directors
Kevin M. O’Connor
Mr. O’Connor is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. He joined the Company in October 2007 as President and Chief Executive Officer Designee and Director. On January 1, 2008, he became President and CEO. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. O’Connor served as Executive Vice President and Treasurer of North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. from 1997 through 2007. Mr. O’Connor is a graduate of Adelphi University. Mr. O’Connor’s background and extensive banking experience provides a valuable resource to the Board of Directors.
NEOs Who Are Not Directors
Howard H. Nolan
Mr. Nolan is Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Corporate Secretary. He previously served as Chief Administrative & Financial Officer of the Company. Mr. Nolan is a Certified Public Accountant and joined the Board as a Director in 2003 and was appointed Chief Operating Officer in June 2006. Prior to 2006, Mr. Nolan was Vice President of Finance and Treasurer for Gentiva Health Services, Inc. and held various management positions at Long Island Savings Bank and was Senior Audit Manager at KPMG. Mr. Nolan is a graduate of Dowling College.
Kevin L. Santacroce
Mr. Santacroce is Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of the Company. Mr. Santacroce joined the Company in March 1997 as Assistant Cashier and Credit Administrator. In January 2004, Mr. Santacroce was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer. Mr. Santacroce is a graduate of Bryant University.
John M. McCaffery
Mr. McCaffery is Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. McCaffery joined the Company in 2012 as Senior Vice President and Treasurer, was promoted to Executive Vice President in 2014 and appointed Chief Financial Officer in 2016. Prior to his service at the Company, Mr. McCaffery was the Treasurer of State Bank of Long Island. Mr. McCaffery is a graduate of Hofstra University.
James J. Manseau
Mr. Manseau is Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Banking Officer of the Company. Mr. Manseau joined the Company as Senior Vice President and Chief Retail Banking Officer in March 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Manseau served as a Divisional Senior Vice President with North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. and Capital One. Mr. Manseau is a graduate of the State University of New York at Farmingdale.
- 8 -
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
The Board of Directors has established a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committeefor the selection of Directors to be elected by the shareholders. Nominations of Directors to the Board are recommended by the Committee and determined by the full Board of Directors. The Board believes that it is appropriate to have the input of all Directors with respect to the candidates to be considered for election to the Board by the shareholders. In this regard, the Board believes that each individual director has a unique insight into the operations of the Company and the Bank, the communities in which we operate, and the needs of the Company with respect to Board membership.
The Board has determined that, except as to Mr. O’Connor, each member of the Board is an “independent director” within the meaning of the corporate governance listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Mr. O’Connor is not considered independent because he is an employee of the Company. In reaching independence determinations of other Directors, the Board considered loans outstanding that were made on the same terms as available to others and as to the independence of Mr. Tobin, noted that the continuing compensation he receives from the Company for his prior employment as an executive officer, which employment ceased on March 2, 2010, is non-discretionary and not contingent on continuing service.
The Company’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Charter outlines the nomination process and is available on the Company’s website, www.bnbbank.com. The Committee identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are relevant to the Company’s business and who are willing to continue in service are first considered for re-nomination, balancing the value of continuity of service by existing members of the Board with that of gaining new perspectives. The Committee coordinates annual performance evaluations for the board of directors. All nominees for director currently serve on the Board. If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service, or if the Committee decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, or if the size of the Board is increased, the Committee would solicit suggestions for director candidates from all Board members. The Board would seek to identify a candidate who at a minimum satisfies the following criteria:
· | Has the highest personal and professional ethics and integrity and whose values are compatible with those of the Company; |
· | Has had experiences and achievements that have given him or her the ability to exercise and develop good business judgment; |
· | Is willing to devote the necessary time to the work of the Board and its Committees, which includes being available for Board and Committee meetings; |
· | Is familiar with the communities in which the Company operates and/or is actively engaged in community activities; |
· | Is involved in other activities or interests that do not create a conflict with their responsibilities to the Company and its shareholders; and |
· | Has the capacity and desire to represent the balanced, best interests of the shareholders of the Company as a group, and not primarily a special interest group or constituency. |
The charter of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee was amended in 2019 to provide that diversity, inclusive of gender, race and ethnicity, shall be part of the selection criteria for determining the individuals to be considered for election and re-election to the Board. Further, the amended charter provides that the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee shall endeavor in good faith to include women and people of color in each candidate pool for a position on the Board and in senior management. There is currently one woman on the Board of Directors and no persons of color.
- 9 -
PROCEDURES FOR THE NOMINATION OF DIRECTORS BY SHAREHOLDERS
The Board has adopted procedures for the submission of director nominees by shareholders. If a determination is made that an additional candidate is needed for the Board of Directors, the Board will consider candidates submitted by a shareholder. Shareholders can submit the names of qualified candidates for Director by writing to our Corporate Secretary, Bridge Bancorp, Inc., 2200 Montauk Highway, P.O. Box 3005, Bridgehampton, New York 11932. The Corporate Secretary must receive a submission not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date of the Company’s proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting. The submission must include the following information:
· | The name and address of the shareholder as they appear on the Company’s books, and number of shares of Common Stock that are owned beneficially by such shareholder (if the shareholder is not a holder of record, appropriate evidence of the shareholder’s ownership will be required); |
· | The name, address and contact information for the candidate, and the number of shares of Common Stock that are owned by the candidate (if the candidate is not a holder of record, appropriate evidence of shareholder ownership should be provided); |
· | A statement of the candidate’s business and educational experience; |
· | Such other information regarding the candidate as would be required to be included in the proxy statement pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A; |
· | A statement detailing any relationship between the candidate and the Company; |
· | A statement detailing any relationship between the candidate and any customer, supplier or competitor of the Company; |
· | Detailed information about any relationship or understanding between the proposing shareholder and the candidate; and |
· | A statement that the candidate is willing to be considered and willing to serve as a Director if nominated and elected. |
A nomination submitted by a shareholder for presentation by the shareholder at an annual meeting of shareholders must comply with the procedural and informational requirements described in “Advance Notice of Business or Nominations to Be Brought Before an Annual Meeting.”
SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
A shareholder of the Company who wants to communicate with the Board of Directors or with any individual Director can write to the Corporate Secretary, Bridge Bancorp, Inc., 2200 Montauk Highway, P.O. Box 3005, Bridgehampton, New York 11932, Attention: Board Administration.
The letter should indicate that the author is a shareholder and if shares are not held of record, should include appropriate evidence of stock ownership. Depending on the subject matter, the Corporate Secretary will:
· | Forward the communication to the Director or Directors to whom it is addressed; |
· | Attempt to handle the inquiry directly, for example where it is a request for information about the Company or it is a stock-related matter; or |
· | Not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in nature, relates to an improper or irrelevant topic, or is unduly hostile, threatening, illegal or otherwise inappropriate. |
At each Board meeting, the Corporate Secretary shall present a summary of all communications received since the last meeting that were not forwarded and make those communications available to the Directors.
CODE OF ETHICS
The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics that is applicable to the officers, directors and employees of the Company, including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller,
- 10 -
or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s website, www.bnbbank.com. Amendments to and waivers from the Code of Ethics will also be disclosed on the Company’s website.
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The following three standing committees facilitate and assist the Board in executing its responsibilities: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The table below shows current membership for each of the standing Board committees.
Audit | Compensation | Corporate Governance and | |||
Rudolph J. Santoro* | Emanuel Arturi* | Dennis A. Suskind* | |||
Charles I. Massoud | Marcia Z. Hefter | Charles I. Massoud | |||
Raymond A. Nielsen | Albert E. McCoy, Jr. | Rudolph J. Santoro | |||
Daniel Rubin | Raymond A. Nielsen | Raymond A. Nielsen | |||
Dennis A. Suskind | Matthew Lindenbaum | Matthew Lindenbaum |
* Committee Chairperson
The business of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank is conducted through meetings and activities of the Boards and their Committees. The Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank meets monthly, or more often as may be necessary. The Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank met 24 times during 2019. No Director attended fewer than 75% in the aggregate of the total number of Board meetings held and the total number of Committee meetings on which he or she served during 2019, including Board and Committee meetings of the Bank and the Company. Although it has no official policy, the Board strongly encourages each of its members to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All persons serving on the Board of Directors at the time of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 3, 2019 attended the meeting.
BOARD LEADERSHIP AND RISK OVERSIGHT
Board Leadership Structure
The Board historically has been chaired by an independent director, rather than the chief executive officer. The current chairperson is Ms. Marcia Hefter. The Board of Directors believes that the non-executive chair structure helps to distinguish the role of the chairperson, in managing the board, which in turn serves in an oversight capacity, from the responsibilities of the chief executive officer in managing the operations of the Company.
The Role of the Board in Risk Oversight
The entire Board of Directors is engaged in risk management oversight. The Risk and Audit Committees assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of the Company’s corporate-wide risk management and in identifying, measuring, monitoring, and managing risks, and as to the Audit Committee in particular, material financial risks. The Bank’s Enterprise Risk Committee receives regular reports from the Compensation, Credit, ALCO, Operational and Compliance Risk Committees of the Board. In addition, the Enterprise Risk Management Committee (“ERMC”), provides regular reports as to the actions taken by management to adequately address those risks.
- 11 -
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee consists of Directors Santoro (Chairperson), Massoud, Nielsen, Rubin, and Suskind. Each member of the Audit Committee is considered “independent” as defined in the NASDAQ® corporate governance listing standards and under SEC Rule 10A‑3. The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee include, among other things:
· | Retaining, overseeing and evaluating the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to audit the annual consolidated financial statements of the Company; |
· | Overseeing the Company’s financial reporting processes in consultation with the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the internal audit function; |
· | Reviewing the annual audited consolidated financial statements, quarterly financial statements and the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s report with management and the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and recommending inclusion of the annual audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form 10‑K; |
· | Maintaining direct lines of communication with the Board of Directors, management, internal audit staff and the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; |
· | Overseeing the internal audit function and reviewing management’s administration of the system of internal accounting controls; |
· | Approving all engagements for audit and non-audit services by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; and |
· | Reviewing the adequacy of the Audit Committee charter. |
The Audit Committee met nine times during 2019. The Audit Committee reports to the Board on its activities and findings. The Board of Directors has determined that Rudolph Santoro and Dennis Suskind are “Audit Committee Financial Experts” as that term is used in the rules and regulations of the SEC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. A copy of the charter of the Audit Committee is available on the Company’s website, www.bnbbank.com.
Management is responsible for the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and their assessment of the design and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and opining on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and issuing their reports thereon. As provided in its charter, the Audit Committee’s responsibilities include monitoring and overseeing these processes.
In discharging its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:
· | Reviewed and discussed with management, and the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019; |
· | Reviewed and discussed with the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm all matters required to be discussed under the applicable requirements of the PCAOB; and |
· | Received the written disclosures and the letter from the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm its independence from the Company. |
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2019 and filed with the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee selected Crowe LLP to be the
- 12 -
Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year ending December 31, 2020, subject to the ratification of this appointment by the shareholders.
This report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.
The foregoing report has been furnished by Audit Committee members:
Rudolph J. Santoro, Chairperson | |
Charles I. Massoud | |
Raymond A. Nielsen Daniel Rubin | |
Dennis A. Suskind |
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to the compensation and benefits provided to the Company’s executive management and to review, administer, evaluate and recommend the benefit plans and overall compensation for the Company.
The Compensation Committee met fiveseven times in fiscal year 2016.2019. The Compensation Committee consists of Directors Arturi (Chairperson), Hefter, McCoy Jr., Nielsen, and Yegen.Lindenbaum. Each member is considered independent as defined in the NASDAQ® corporate governance listing standards. The Board has adopted a charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on the Company’s website,www.bridgenb.com.
www.bnbbank.com.
The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include, among other duties, the responsibility to:
· | Establish, review, and modify from time to time as appropriate the overall compensation philosophy of the Company; |
· | Review, evaluate and recommend Company objectives relevant to the CEO’s compensation; evaluate CEO performance relative to established goals; and review, evaluate and recommend to the full Board of Directors, the CEO’s compensation; |
· | Review, evaluate and recommend goals relevant to the compensation of the Company’s other executive management personnel; and review such officers’ performance in light of these goals and determine (or recommend to the full Board of Directors for determination) such officers’ cash and equity compensation based on this evaluation; |
· | Review, evaluate and recommend, in consultation with the corporate governance committee, the compensation to be paid to directors of the Company and of affiliates of the Company for their service on the Board; |
· | Administer the Company’s stock benefit plans; and |
· | Review and oversee incentive compensation arrangements of the Bank to ensure they are balanced relative to incentives and risk objectives. |
Compensation recommendations for the President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), Chief Lending Officer (“CLO”), Chief Retail Banking Officer (“CRO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), collectively known as NEOs, are made by the Compensation Committee to the Board of Directors. Decisions regarding non-equity compensation for the other officers are made under the authority
- 12 -
of the Company’s CEO. The Committee has engaged McLagan, an AON Hewitt company, an outside and independent national compensation consulting firm, to assist in the annual review of its incentive compensation arrangements for the NEOs and all other employee groups of the Bank. McLagan has not provided any other services for the Company.
At the request of the Committee, Compensation Committee meetings are regularly attended by the CEO, COO, CFO and COO.Chief Talent Officer (“CTO”). At each meeting, the Compensation Committee meets in executive session, which excludes
- 13 -
executive management. The Compensation Committee’s Chairperson reports the Committee’s recommendations on executive compensation to the Board. Independent advisors and the Company’s finance department support the Compensation Committee in its duties and, along with the CEO, COO, CFO, and COO,CTO, may be delegated authority to fulfill certain administrative duties regarding the compensation programs.
In addition, the Compensation Committee engaged McLagan to assist in the review of potential risks stemming from the Company’s compensation programs. McLagan conducted a comprehensive review and evaluation of incentive plans covering all employees of the Company. The review included an evaluation of the design features of each plan, the governance and oversight aspects of each plan, the mix of cash and equity incentives opportunities, the use of performance metrics, the performance periods and time horizon of each plan, the various termination provisions associated with the plans, and other dimensions of the plans deemed relevant for the risk review process. McLagan reviewed the results of its assessment with the Committee and with management. Based on the results of the independent assessment by McLagan and the assessment of risks by the Committee, the Board has determined that the Company’s compensation policies, practices and programs do not promote excessive risk taking or pose risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Bridge Bancorp, Inc.
The Compensation Committee considered the independence of McLagan, in light of SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards. The Committee requested and received a report from McLagan addressing the independence of McLagan and its consultants, including the following factors: (1) other services provided to us by McLagan; (2) fees paid by us as a percentage of Aon’sMcLagan’s total revenue; (3) policies or procedures maintained by McLagan that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between the consultants and a member of the Committee; (5) any company stock owned by the consultants; and (6) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the consultants. The Committee discussed these considerations and concluded that the work performed by McLagan and its consultants involved in the engagements did not raise any conflict of interest and that McLagan has served as an independent compensation consultant.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Compensation Committee consists of Directors Arturi (Chairperson), Hefter, McCoy, Jr., Nielsen, and Yegen.Lindenbaum. None of these directors was during 2016,2019, or is formerly, an officer of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company had no “interlocking” relationships in which any executive officer of the Company is a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers is a member of the Company’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The primary goals of the Compensation Committee (“Committee”) for 20162019 were consistent with its established philosophy of providing compensation arrangements for executive officers that are designed to attract and retain executives who can perform and manage the Company in the shareholders’ best interest. These compensation arrangements are designed to be aligned with the performance of the Company both on a short-term and long-term basis and are based on individual contributions and the Company’s performance.
- 13 -
Company Performance
Our Company has experienced significant growth in assets, deposits and earnings over the past five years while maintaining very favorable credit quality.
In 2016,2019, the management team continued to grow our Company and take advantage of opportunities available in our marketplace. The Committee views the performance in 20162019 as a continuation of performance at a very high level as shown below:
· | Performance: |
- 14 -
sheet restructure and fourth quarter office relocation and consolidation resulting in total charges of $6.8 million |
· | Growth Strategy: The Company has continued its disciplined growth strategy delivering growth in both loans and |
· | Capital Management and Dividend Payments: The Company has attracted and retained access to the capital and debt markets, and generated capital through retained earnings, increasing stockholders’ equity $322 million since December 31, 2014. This capital was deployed to support the growth associated with the acquisition of CNB in June 2015, as well as organic growth. In 2019, the Company paid four quarterly dividends to shareholders totaling $0.92 per share. In January 2020, the Company increased its quarterly dividend by 4% to $0.24 per share. This continues the Company’s long term trend of uninterrupted dividends. |
· | Long-Term Performance: From January 1, |
Key Compensation Decisions – Executive Summary
Increased Base Salaries – Based upon a review of compensation paid to executives in the proxy peer group and in light of Company and individual performance for 2019, the Committee and Board adjusted salaries for 2020 for the NEOs as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 |
| % Increase |
| ||
Kevin M. O’Connor |
| $ | 750,000 |
| $ | 700,000 |
| 7% |
|
John M. McCaffery |
| $ | 390,000 |
| $ | 375,000 |
| 4% |
|
Howard H. Nolan |
| $ | 375,000 |
| $ | 365,000 |
| 3% |
|
Kevin L. Santacroce |
| $ | 380,000 |
| $ | 365,000 |
| 4% |
|
James J. Manseau |
| $ | 345,000 |
| $ | 330,000 |
| 5% |
|
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Kevin M. O’Connor | $ | 600,000 | $ | 515,000 | ||||
Howard H. Nolan | $ | 330,000 | $ | 305,000 | ||||
Kevin Santacroce | $ | 315,000 | $ | 300,000 | ||||
John M. McCaffery | $ | 305,000 | $ | 285,000 | ||||
James Manseau | $ | 300,000 | $ | 285,000 |
Payments Under the Short Term Incentive Plan: The primary performance vehicle for the Bank is the Short Term Incentive Program (“STIP”). The STIP is based 100% on absolute measures established by the Compensation Committee and Board. The board retains 20% discretion. The STIP establishes threshold, target and maximum performance criteria for each performance goal. The Company must achieve threshold performance level in order for a minimum payout to occur. For 2019, the Company’s performance achievement was 72% of maximum based on reported results. After consideration of the impact of certain strategic decisions on the reported results, including the intentional run-off of higher cost broker and 1031 deposits and the sale and runoff of lower yielding investments, the Board determined STIP was awarded at 92% achievement inclusive of 20% board discretion, as provided in the plan. This achievement is between target and maximum performance compared to 62% achievement in 2018. No discretion was awarded by the Board in 2018. The Plan awards for 2019 were paid 100% in cash for all NEOs except for Mr. O’Connor who received 80% in cash and 20% in restricted
- 1415 -
Long Term Incentive Plan: During 2016,2019, in accordance with the Long Term Incentive Plan (“LTI Plan”), the Board granted long term stock awards including performance based awards. The awards are determined by the Committee and Board within a specified target range of between 30-50%30‑60% of salary. The maximum award cannot exceed 150% of the target amount. The LTI Plan includes 60% performance vestedbased awards and 40% time vested awards. The performance based awards are in the form of 30% Performance Share Units (“PSUs”) and 30% premium priced stock options. The PSUs cliff vest after three years contingent upon the achievement of the Board established 3 year EPS goals, subject to adjustment up or down based upon the Company’s 3 year total shareholder return (“TSR”) relative to peer banks with target achievement based onbanks. The stock options reflect an exercise price at a 10% premium to the 50th percentile and maximum achievement based onclosing price at the 75th percentile.date of grant. The time vested awards are in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and cliff vest afterratably over five years and require an additional two year holding period before the RSUs are delivered in shares of common stock.years. Please see “Long Term Stock Incentive Program” and “Realizable Compensation” under the section “2016“2019 Executive Compensation Components” for more details.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation:Compensation:
· | Base Salary |
· | STIP Award |
· | LTI Plan– As noted above, the Board approved the grant of equity in |
Other Named Executive Officer Compensation:Compensation:
· | Base Salaries – As noted above, the Board increased base salaries between |
· | STIP Award– Each of the officers listed below |
· | LTI Plan - The other executives also participated in the LTI Plan described above with grants of equity in |
- 16 -
The Summary Compensation Table includes the cash portion of the STIP award earned in 2016,2019, based on 20162019 performance and paid in 2017,2020, and restricted stock awards, and restricted stock units, performance share units and stock options granted on February 4, 201612, 2019 based on 20152018 performance as presented below:
- 15 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2019 Cash |
| 2019 Stock / RSU Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Stock |
| Total Stock | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| 2019 Cash |
| Incentive % |
| STIP |
| Long Term |
|
|
|
|
|
| RSU / Options |
| RSU / Options | |||||||||||||
NEO |
| 2019 Base Salary |
| Incentive |
| Salary |
| Shares |
| $ |
| PSUs |
| $ |
| RSUs |
| $ |
| Stock Options |
| $ |
| Awards # |
| Awards $ | |||||||
Kevin M. O’Connor |
| $ | 700,000 |
| $ | 463,680 |
| 66.2 | % | 1,628 |
| $ | 52,320 |
| 3,187 |
| $ | 112,500 |
| 4,667 |
| $ | 150,000 |
| 22,277 |
| $ | 112,500 |
| 31,759 |
| $ | 427,320 |
John M. McCaffery |
| $ | 375,000 |
| $ | 207,000 |
| 55.2 | % | 810 |
| $ | 26,040 |
| 1,487 |
| $ | 52,500 |
| 2,178 |
| $ | 70,000 |
| 10,396 |
| $ | 52,500 |
| 14,871 |
| $ | 201,040 |
Howard H. Nolan |
| $ | 365,000 |
| $ | 201,500 |
| 55.2 | % | 810 |
| $ | 26,040 |
| 1,487 |
| $ | 52,500 |
| 2,178 |
| $ | 70,000 |
| 10,396 |
| $ | 52,500 |
| 14,871 |
| $ | 201,040 |
Kevin L. Santacroce |
| $ | 365,000 |
| $ | 201,500 |
| 55.2 | % | 810 |
| $ | 26,040 |
| 1,487 |
| $ | 52,500 |
| 2,178 |
| $ | 70,000 |
| 10,396 |
| $ | 52,500 |
| 14,871 |
| $ | 201,040 |
James J. Manseau |
| $ | 330,000 |
| $ | 182,200 |
| 55.2 | % | 382 |
| $ | 12,280 |
| 1,402 |
| $ | 49,500 |
| 2,054 |
| $ | 66,000 |
| 9,802 |
| $ | 49,500 |
| 13,640 |
| $ | 177,280 |
2016 Stock / RSU Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||
STIP | Long Term | |||||||||||||||||||||
2016 Cash | Total Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||
2016 Cash | Incentive % | / RSU | ||||||||||||||||||||
NEO | 2016 Base Salary | Incentive | Salary | Shares | $ | PSUs | $ | RSUs | $ | Awards | $ | |||||||||||
Kevin M. O'Connor | $600,000 | $199,800 | 33.3% | 5,558 | $154,500 | 5,153 | $120,251 | 3,453 | $80,154 | 14,164 | $354,905 | |||||||||||
Howard H. Nolan | $330,000 | $73,250 | 22.2% | 2,414 | $67,100 | 2,426 | $56,614 | 1,626 | $37,744 | 6,466 | $161,458 | |||||||||||
Kevin L. Santacroce | $315,000 | $69,950 | 22.2% | 2,158 | $60,000 | 2,426 | $56,614 | 1,626 | $37,744 | 6,210 | $154,358 | |||||||||||
John McCaffery | $305,000 | $67,700 | 22.2% | 2,050 | $57,000 | 2,426 | $56,614 | 1,626 | $37,744 | 6,102 | $151,358 | |||||||||||
James J. Manseau | $300,000 | $66,600 | 22.2% | 2,050 | $57,000 | 2,426 | $56,614 | 1,626 | $37,744 | 6,102 | $151,358 |
Shareholder Vote
At our 20162019 annual meeting, 95.3%94.3% of our shareholders approved our “say-on-pay” resolution as to the executive compensation disclosed in last year’s proxy statement. The Company considered the shareholder advisory vote from the most recent annual meeting to be a positive endorsement of its current pay practices and believes the vote result is evidence that its compensation policies and decisions have been in the best interests of shareholders. As a result, the Compensation Committee retained its overall approach to executive compensation. The Company will continue to monitor the level of support for each say-on-pay proposal in the future and will consider this alongside other factors as it makes future executive compensation decisions.
Overview of the Compensation Plan
The Committee has responsibility for establishing, implementing and continually monitoring adherence with the Company’s compensation philosophy. The goal of the Committee is for the total compensation awarded to, earned by, and paid to our named executive officersNEOs and “covered employees” to be fair, reasonable and competitive and to comply with the regulatory guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies (“SICP”). Our Named Executive Officers (referred to as NEOs) are Kevin M. O’Connor, President and Chief Executive Officer, Howard H. Nolan, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Kevin L. Santacroce, Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer, James J. Manseau, Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Banking Officer, and John M. McCaffery, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Covered employees included senior executives as well as other employees who, either individually or as part of a group, have the ability to expose the Company or Bank to material amounts of risk.
The Committee annually reviews the administration of the compensation plans.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The compensation philosophy, established by the Committee, provides broad guidance on executive compensation and, more specifically, the compensation of the NEOs and other covered employees. The incentive compensation plans are designed to be consistent with safety and soundness standards and the regulatory guidance on SICP. The Plans include consideration of the following key principles:
· | Incentive compensation arrangements should provide employees with incentives that appropriately balance risk and financial results in a manner that does not encourage employees to expose the Company or Bank to imprudent risk; |
· | These arrangements should be compatible with effective controls and risk management; and |
· | These arrangements should be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the Company’s Board of Directors. |
The Committee engaged McLagan, an Aon Hewitt companywhich is part of the Rewards Solutions practice at AON plc, as its independent compensation consultant to review the design of the Company’s compensation plans and associated policies and procedures in light of the compliance requirements of the SICP.
- 16 -
The compensation philosophy includes:
· | Aligning shareholder value with compensation; |
· | Providing a direct and transparent link between our performance and pay for the NEOs; |
· | Aligning the interests of the Company’s senior executive officers with that of the shareholders through performance based incentive plans; |
- 17 -
· | Making wise use of the Company’s equity resources to ensure compatibility between management and shareholder interests; and |
· | Awarding total compensation that is both reasonable and effective in attracting, motivating, and retaining key executives. |
The compensation objectives of Bridge Bancorp, Inc.the Company and The Bridgehampton National Bank, subject to experience and achieving plan performance, are to:
· | Pay base salaries to the Company’s senior executives at a level consistent with the Company’s performance related to the Company’s selected peer group (the market); |
· | Provide total cash compensation (salary and cash incentive compensation) to the Company’s senior executives at a level consistent with performance related to market; |
· | Provide total direct compensation (the sum of salary, cash incentives and equity incentives) at a level consistent with performance related to market, based on planned and cumulative performance; |
· | Align senior management’s interest with that of shareholders |
· | Comply with the SICP. |
For NEOs, compensation comparisons are based on a peer group of banks, taking into consideration asset size, geographic location, and performance as well as internally developed goals. However, reasonable exceptions to this market comparison methodology are considered as appropriate by the Compensation Committee.
In addition, the Company’s compensation philosophy is to provide retirement benefits that are competitive with market practice. The Compensation Committee of the Board annually reviews the administration of the compensation plans.
We have considered the most recent shareholder say-on-pay advisory vote in determining compensation policies and decisions. In light of strong stockholder support, the Committee concluded that no material revisions were necessary to our executive officer 2019 compensation program.
The Committee annually assesses the Company’s compensation program to ensure alignment with the strategic plan and overall risk profile.
Risk Assessment Process to Determine Covered Employees
Our management has reviewed all job positions to determine which positions have the ability to expose us to material risks. In determining whether an employee, or group of employees, may expose us to material risk, management considered the full range of inherent risks arising from or generated by, the employees’ activities, including Credit/Asset Quality, Asset Liability/Interest Rate Risk, Liquidity, Operational/Transactional, Compliance/Legal, Reputation and Strategic risks.
- 17 -
Risks are considered to be material if they are material to the Company or Bank, or a business line or operating unit of the Bank that is itself material to the Company or Bank.
Principle 1: Balanced Risk Taking Incentives
All covered employees’ incentive plans were evaluated to determine if the plans appropriately balance risk and financial results in a manner that does not encourage imprudent risks.
Principle 2: Compatibility with Effective Controls and Risk Management
The Bank’s risk management processes and internal controls reinforce and support the development and maintenance of balanced incentive compensation arrangements. These processes and controls include documentation to permit an audit of the effectiveness of the Bank’s process for establishing, modifying and monitoring incentive compensation arrangements.
Principle 3: Strong Corporate Governance
Our incentive compensation plans are supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the Compensation Committee and Board. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews all incentive plans and has hired an independent compensation consultant, McLagan, to assess the incentive compensation arrangements for compliance with SICP. The Committee receives information and analysis from McLagan and management to allow the Committee and Board to assess
- 18 -
whether the overall design and performance of the incentive compensation arrangements are consistent with the Company’s and Bank’s safety and soundness.
Role of Executive OfficersCEO in Compensation Decisions
The CEO does not attend portions of the Committee and Board meetings during which his performance is being evaluated or his compensation is being determined. The CEO provides recommendations to the Committee and Board on the other NEOs compensation. The Committee recommends, and the Board approves, all compensation decisions for the CEO as well as the other NEOs and approves recommendations regarding equity awards to certain officers of the Company. The NEOs annually review the performance and recommend compensation for senior management of the Company who are not NEOs.
Setting Executive Compensation
Based on the foregoing philosophy and objectives, the Committee has structured the Company’s annual and long-term incentive-based cash and equity compensation to motivate executives to achieve the business goals set by the Company and reward the executives for achieving such goals. In furtherance of this, McLagan’s annual review provides the Committee with relevant market data and alternatives to consider when making compensation decisions for the NEOs and on the recommendations being made by the Company’s management for other key executives. In making compensation decisions, the Committee compares each element of total compensation against a peer group of publicly-traded financial institutions that are comparable in asset size and performance (collectively, the “Compensation Peer Group”). When selecting the peer group, peer bank performance is taken into consideration. The key performance measures used in selecting the Company’s peer group are:
· | Asset Size |
· | Geographic Location |
· | Return on Average Equity (“ROAE”) |
· | Non-Performing Assets as a Percentage of Total Assets |
· | Loan Portfolio Focused on Commercial Lending |
- 18 -
The Compensation Peer Group was reviewed by the Committee in 2015,2018, and changes were made to reflect the Company’s asset size following its acquisition of Community National Bank.replace previous peer banks that were acquired. Not all companies in the Compensation Peer Group reported data for each of our executive positions. The twenty two22 companies comprising the Compensation Peer Group used to set fiscal year 20162019 pay levels and to assess relative total shareholder return for 2016 restricted stock unit2019 PSU grants for the NEOs follows:
Market compensation comparisons were based primarily on information from the Compensation Peer Group. Market data was aged by an annualized factor of 3.0% to adjust for the historical nature of the data. Each NEO’s current compensation was compared to the median of the applicable benchmark position within the Compensation Peer Group. Overall base pay and the targeted level of total direct compensation was competitive with the market median - 19 - the evaluation of the Company’s performance in connection with year-end results, the individual’s accomplishments and the position held by the individual.
For fiscal year ended December 31,
Base Salary The Company provides NEOs and other employees with base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the fiscal year. Base salary ranges for NEOs are determined for each executive based on his or her position and responsibility by using market data. Base salary ranges are designed so that salary opportunities for a given position will generally reflect +/- 15% of the market 50th percentile. The annual salary of the NEOs is reviewed annually by the
The increases in Short Term Incentive Program Each NEO has an incentive opportunity defined by a target incentive and range that is based on their role and competitive market practice. Incentive targets/ranges are expressed as a percentage of base salary and determined based on competitive market practice for similar roles in similar organizations. These target incentive awards for 2019 were not increased over the incentive opportunities established for 2018.The Board established the financial performance targets to be used in establishing awards under the STIP for fiscal
|